Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The human element in medical screening

D Laming1

  • 1University of Cambridge, Department of Experimental Psychology, United Kingdom.

Journal of Medical Screening
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two categories of contextual variable in perception.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason's selection task.

Psychological research·2001
Same author

Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms.

Journal of medical screening·2000
Same author

Screening cervical smears.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·1995
Same author

Springer's lines and Hermann's grid.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·1992
Same author

F. Hegelmaier: on memory for the length of a line.

Psychological research·1992

Experienced pathologists may miss cervical cancer cases due to judgment assimilation during smear screening. Immediate feedback on some slides can prevent these systematic misdiagnoses in medical screening.

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Pathologists screening cervical smears can produce false negative diagnoses.
  • This phenomenon is linked to cognitive biases in sequential judgment tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the cognitive mechanisms behind false negative diagnoses in cervical smear screening.
  • To propose a method to mitigate systematic errors in medical screening.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of judgment interactions in sequential stimulus inspection.
  • Simulating the "running away" effect of successive judgments.

Main Results:

  • Identified judgment assimilation as the cause of systematic misdiagnoses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated how sequential judgments can lead to errors in experienced professionals.

    • Conclusions:

    • Immediate knowledge of results for a subset of slides can prevent recurring misdiagnoses.
    • Findings have implications for improving the accuracy of general medical screening protocols.