Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening cervical smears

D Laming1

  • 1University of Cambridge, Department of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge, UK.

British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Experienced pathologists may misdiagnose cervical smears due to judgment assimilation. A feedback procedure is proposed to prevent these systematic errors in screening.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two categories of contextual variable in perception.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason's selection task.

Psychological research·2001
Same author

Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms.

Journal of medical screening·2000
Same author

The human element in medical screening.

Journal of medical screening·1995
Same author

Springer's lines and Hermann's grid.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·1992
Same author

F. Hegelmaier: on memory for the length of a line.

Psychological research·1992

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Cervical smear screening is crucial for early detection of cervical cancer.
  • Pathologists' diagnostic accuracy can be influenced by cognitive biases.
  • Previous studies have not fully explained high false-negative rates in experienced personnel.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the high rate of false-negative diagnoses in cervical smear screening by experienced pathologists.
  • To identify the cognitive mechanisms underlying diagnostic errors in repetitive tasks.
  • To propose a method to mitigate systematic misdiagnoses.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of cognitive interactions between successive judgments during stimulus inspection.
  • Investigating the 'assimilation' effect where judgments influence subsequent ones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulating the 'running away' phenomenon in sequential decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • A plausible explanation for false-negative diagnoses is the assimilation of judgments to predecessors.
    • This cognitive process can lead to systematic errors, termed 'running away'.
    • The accuracy of experienced pathologists can be compromised by this sequential judgment effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive interactions, specifically assimilation, explain false-negative cervical smear diagnoses.
    • A feedback mechanism providing immediate knowledge of results can prevent such errors.
    • Implementing this procedure can improve the reliability of cervical cancer screening.