Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Obstacles to effective developmental surveillance: errors in clinical reasoning

F P Glascoe1, P H Dworkin

  • 1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Child Development Center, Nashville, TN 37232.

Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics : JDBP
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Re: Parents' evaluation of developmental status.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2006
Same author

Detecting and addressing developmental and behavioral problems in primary care.

Pediatric nursing·2002
Same author

A simple provider-based educational intervention to boost infant immunization rates: a controlled trial.

Clinical pediatrics·2001
Same author

Can teachers' global ratings identify children with academic problems?

Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP·2001
Same author

Increasing identification of psychosocial problems.

Pediatrics·2001
Same author

Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem?

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·2001

Pediatricians often miss identifying children with developmental issues, relying on clinical judgment instead of screening tests. This study proposes a model to improve physicians

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Child Psychology
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Early identification and intervention are crucial for children with developmental, behavioral, or emotional problems.
  • Pediatricians are key in detecting these children but often do not use screening tests.
  • Physicians typically rely on clinical impressions, which have limited accuracy in identifying at-risk children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the factors influencing pediatricians' clinical impressions in identifying developmental and behavioral issues.
  • To propose a model for ideal impression formation to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research on clinical impression formation and diagnostic accuracy.
  • Analysis of factors influencing physicians' selection and interpretation of clinical data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a theoretical model for improved clinical judgment.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians' clinical impressions are influenced by personal experiences, beliefs, and attitudes, acting as judgment heuristics.
    • These heuristics can lead to inaccurate identification of children needing developmental support.
    • Current methods identify only about half of the children with developmental difficulties.

    Conclusions:

    • A model of ideal impression formation is suggested to help pediatricians improve the accurate identification of children with developmental and behavioral or emotional problems.
    • Emphasizing the role of cognitive processes in clinical judgment can enhance early detection rates.
    • Further research and training are needed to implement effective screening and diagnostic strategies.