Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two lawyers and a technician

F Randall1

  • 1Macmillan Unit, Christchurch Hospital, Dorset, UK.

Palliative Medicine
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Legalizing euthanasia may paradoxically decrease autonomy and increase suffering for society. This analysis explores the ethical implications for physicians and the doctor-patient relationship, proposing alternative assessment and execution methods.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Upper thermal limits of the hearts of Arctic cod Boreogadus saida: adults compared with larvae.

Journal of fish biology·2015
Same author

Advance care planning in care homes.

Palliative medicine·2010
Same author

The perceived expressed emotion in staff scale.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2003
Same author

Recent guidance on resuscitation: patients' choices and doctors' duties.

Palliative medicine·2002
Same author

Reply to Farsides's editorial: palliative care--a euthanasia-free zone.

Journal of medical ethics·1999
Same author

The meaning and management of neuroleptic medication: a study of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1998

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Societal Impact of Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Arguments for euthanasia legalization often cite increased autonomy and reduced suffering.
  • The ethical implications for medical professionals and the doctor-patient relationship require careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the societal impacts of euthanasia legalization on autonomy and suffering.
  • To analyze the ethical dilemmas for physicians regarding beneficence and euthanasia.
  • To propose alternative models for euthanasia implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical and ethical analysis of arguments for and against euthanasia.
  • Examination of medical ethics, specifically the principle of beneficence.
  • Exploration of potential consequences for the doctor-patient relationship.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal of a procedural model for legalized euthanasia.

    • Main Results:

    • Euthanasia legalization may lead to reduced societal autonomy and increased overall suffering.
    • Involving physicians in euthanasia creates significant ethical conflicts with the principle of beneficence.
    • Legalization could erode trust within the doctor-patient relationship.

    Conclusions:

    • The societal benefits of euthanasia legalization in terms of autonomy and suffering reduction are questionable.
    • Physician involvement in euthanasia presents profound ethical challenges.
    • Alternative frameworks, involving legal professionals and trained technicians, are suggested for euthanasia execution to mitigate ethical conflicts.