Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pacing system analyzers: different systems--different results

J H Wilson1, J B Siegmund, R Johnson

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frustration-Free Control and Absorbing-State Transport in Entangled State Preparation.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Operator Scaling Dimensions and Multifractality at Measurement-Induced Transitions.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Using syndromic surveillance to estimate baseline rates for healthcare-associated infections in critical care units of small animal referral hospitals.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2013
Same author

Balanced anaesthesia in oral and facio-maxillary surgery.

The Dental journal of Australia·2010
Same author

Viburnum Prunifolium, or Black Haw, in Abortion and Miscarriage.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

The man agement and nursing care of craniocerebral injuries.

The Trained nurse and hospital review·2010
Same journal

Dual Coronary Sinus Lead Strategy to Avoid Tricuspid Valve Traversal in Biventricular Pacing.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

Different pacing system analyzers (PSAs) yield varying electrogram amplitudes during pacemaker implantation. Despite differences, all methods correlate well, ensuring no clinical complications with modern pacemaker programming.

Area of Science:

  • Electrophysiology
  • Cardiovascular Devices
  • Medical Instrumentation

Background:

  • Pacemaker implantation involves measuring electrophysiological parameters using pacing system analyzers (PSAs).
  • Variations in filter settings and measurement techniques across different PSAs and implanted pacemakers may affect readings.
  • Standardized measurement protocols are crucial for accurate device assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the significant differences in electrophysiological measurements obtained using three distinct PSAs and a manual method.
  • To evaluate the impact of PSA variability on intracardiac electrogram amplitude measurements.
  • To assess the clinical implications of using different PSAs during pacemaker implantation.

Main Methods:

  • Measurements were obtained from 99 patients using three different PSAs and a manual method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Intracardiac electrogram amplitudes were recorded and compared across all measurement techniques.
  • Statistical correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the different methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in intracardiac electrogram amplitudes were observed among the three PSAs tested.
    • Electrogram amplitudes measured by PSAs were generally higher than those obtained by manual measurement.
    • Despite quantitative differences, all measurement methods demonstrated good correlation with each other.

    Conclusions:

    • While different PSAs yield varying electrogram amplitudes, they correlate well, indicating reliability.
    • The use of a PSA during pacemaker implantation, even with different sensing techniques, does not lead to clinical complications.
    • Current practices in pacemaker programming are robust despite inter-analyzer measurement variability.