Related Experiment Videos
Update evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia: when should we offer prostatectomy?
1Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Turkey.
British Journal of Urology
|November 1, 1994
Summary
Evaluating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) requires correlating symptoms with urodynamic tests. Pressure-flow studies help identify unobstructed patients, preventing unnecessary prostatectomies for BPH.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men, often presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms.
- Current diagnostic methods for BPH include symptom analysis and basic urodynamic tests, but their correlation with surgical outcomes can be variable.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate correlations between traditional and urodynamic criteria in evaluating prostatism.
- To update the evaluation of patients with BPH to prevent unnecessary prostatectomies.
Main Methods:
- Ninety-six patients (aged 43-86 years) with BPH and prostatism were assessed.
- Methods included symptom analysis, digital rectal examination, residual urine determination, uroflowmetry, and multichannel urodynamic testing (cystometry, pressure-flow study).
Main Results:
- Residual urine determination was unreliable for surgical selection.
- A significant correlation was found between symptomatology and multichannel urodynamic study results.
- No correlation existed between irritative symptoms and detrusor instability.
Conclusions:
- A notable 23% of patients were urodynamically unobstructed and potentially unsuitable for prostatectomy.
- Pressure-flow studies are recommended for BPH patients with dominant irritative symptoms to identify unobstructed individuals.