Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Esophageal replacement--indications, technique, results]

V Schumpelick1, B Dreuw, K Ophoff

  • 1Chirurgische Klinik, Medizinischen Fakultät, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen.

Leber, Magen, Darm
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated 239 patients undergoing esophageal reconstruction for malignancy. Stomach transposition, colon interposition, and free jejunal autografts were compared, with jejunal autografts showing no in-hospital mortality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Multiple recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma in a 66-year-old man].

Der Internist·2019
Same author

Multicenter phase II trial to investigate safety and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with cetuximab as adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer (ATIP).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2013
Same author

[An algorithm for postoperative pain management in visceral and thoracic surgery: an observational study].

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2011
Same author

[Colonic J-pouch reconstruction in cases of insufficiency and severe complications after ileocecal pouch in rectal cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2002
Same author

[Concomitant occurrence of angiomyolipoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, bile duct adenoma, and cavernous hemangioma in the liver].

Der Pathologe·2002
Same author

Activity and cellular origin of gelatinases in patients with colon and rectal carcinoma differential activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9.

Cancer·2001

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Surgical Oncology
  • Esophageal Surgery and Reconstruction

Background:

  • Esophageal replacement and reconstruction are critical procedures for patients with benign or malignant esophageal diseases.
  • Various reconstructive techniques, including stomach transposition, colon interposition, and free jejunal autografts, have been employed.
  • Understanding the outcomes and complications associated with each method is essential for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the outcomes of esophageal replacement and reconstruction in a large cohort of patients.
  • To compare the efficacy and safety of different reconstructive techniques: stomach transposition, colon interposition, and free jejunal autograft.
  • To evaluate survival rates and complication profiles associated with these surgical interventions for esophageal and hypopharyngeal malignancies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 239 patients who underwent esophageal replacement and primary reconstruction between November 1985 and January 1994.
  • Reconstructive methods included stomach transposition (n=202), colon interposition (n=16), and free jejunal autograft (n=21).
  • Data collected included complication rates, lethality, survival rates (life-table analysis), tumor types (esophageal carcinoma, esophagogastric junction carcinoma, hypopharyngeal carcinoma), and tumor staging.

Main Results:

  • A total of 236 patients had malignancy; 3 had benign disease.
  • Overall surgical resection complication rate was 36.8% with a 5.1% lethality.
  • Lethality for colon interposition (6.3%) and gastric transposition (5.5%) were similar; free jejunal autograft had no in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001).
  • Five-year survival rates for the entire group were 22%.
  • Esophageal and cardia carcinoma groups showed similar age, sex, and stage distributions, but cardia carcinoma had higher rates of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions:

  • Free jejunal autograft appears to be a safe and effective method for esophageal reconstruction, demonstrating superior in-hospital survival.
  • Stomach transposition and colon interposition offer comparable outcomes regarding lethality for esophageal replacement.
  • Further investigation into risk factors and tailored surgical approaches for different esophageal pathologies, such as cardia carcinoma, is warranted.