Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Did George McClellan commit malpractice?

C E Letocha

    Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
    |January 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Dr. George McClellan won a libel suit, not lost an ophthalmic malpractice case. The trial offers insights into 1820s cataract surgery and revealed the secret Kappa Lambda medical society.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Follow-up of 3 patients with Ridley intraocular lens implantation.

    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·1999
    Same author

    A bicenquinquagenary worth noting. Daviel's introduction of the modern cataract operation.

    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1997
    Same author

    The American Academy of Ophthalmology.

    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1996
    Same author

    The invention and early manufacture of bifocals.

    Survey of ophthalmology·1990
    Same author

    Rubens Peale and his spectacles.

    JAMA·1987
    Same author

    The origin of spectacles.

    Survey of ophthalmology·1986
    Same journal

    Effects of short-term moderate versus high intraocular pressure elevation on flicker-induced changes in full-field electroretinogram.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    The relationship between foveal anatomy and retinal function in oculocutaneous albinism.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Early onset primary angle closure and foveal retinoschisis associated with a pseudo-homozygous CRB1 pathogenic variant.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical History
    • Ophthalmology
    • Legal History

    Background:

    • Historical accounts incorrectly state Dr. George McClellan lost an ophthalmic malpractice suit.
    • Original sources reveal McClellan was involved in a libel suit, not a malpractice case.

    Discussion:

    • The trial testimony provides valuable insights into 1820s cataract surgery techniques and challenges.
    • It sheds light on the medical and legal climate of the early 19th century in the United States.
    • The proceedings exposed the existence of Kappa Lambda, a clandestine medical society.

    Key Insights:

    • Dr. McClellan's legal battle was a libel suit, not an ophthalmic malpractice case.
    • The trial serves as a historical record of early cataract surgery practices.
    • Public awareness of the secret society Kappa Lambda emerged from this legal dispute.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Outlook:

    • Further research into Kappa Lambda's influence on medical practices during that era is warranted.
    • Analyzing trial records can offer deeper understanding of patient-physician relationships in the 1820s.
    • This case highlights the importance of verifying historical medical and legal accounts.