An investigation into the potential veterinary needs of a semi-rural low-income community

The diagnostic phase of an interactive veterinary research evaluation model was used in the investigation into the potential veterinary needs of a low-income, semi-rural community. The economic status of households was estimated according to an economic situation score (ESSCORE) and a subjective nutritional score (SNS). Data were gathered by means of structured interviews and direct observations. Sixty-one per cent of the households (n = 190) owned animals. Dogs were the animal most frequently owned. However on the basis of total numbers, chickens were the most numerous and the second most frequent animal kept. The relative frequency of cattle and goats, was also considerably higher than that of dogs. Few sheep were owned by respondents, although they were an animal species that people desired to own. The finding that respondents saw more disadvantages than benefits in their neighbour's animals, indicated that increased animal ownership could lead to friction. Better fencing might decrease the damage caused by goats and donkeys. A considerable excess of consumption over production of animal products, was discovered. Meat and milk were seen as the main benefits by those who did not own animals. This indicated a possible market for animal products if production were increased. It was considered that subsidised veterinary extension might be the most cost-effective solution for those who cannot afford to pay for curative interventions.