Transvenous cardioverter defibrillators: cost implications of a less invasive approach

To assess the economic impact of a transvenous lead system for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), we evaluated the hospital charges for two groups of patients: group I patients (n = 23) underwent implantation of an ICD generator with an epicardial lead system via a thoracotomy and group II patients (n = 25) underwent implantation of the same generator using transvenous leads. There was no difference in demographics between the two groups. There was a 15% decrease in total charges for the transvenous group compared to the thoracotomy group ($54,142 vs $63,359, P < 0.05). Evaluation of the component charges revealed that the decline could be attributed to a reduction in implant ($27,328 vs $29,285, P < 0.02) and convalescent charges ($7,703 vs $15,179, P < 0.01) for the transvenous group. There was a corresponding decrease in length of stay for the transvenous group (22 vs 29 days, P < 0.05) largely secondary to a 38% reduction in convalescent length of stay (8 vs 13 days, P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of transvenous lead systems for the ICD results in a significant reduction in hospital charges as well as hospital length of stay.