Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital subtraction in defecography

A P Brady1, S Somers, D Hough

  • 1Department of Radiology, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abdominal Imaging
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Radiology (with AI) christmas carol: Past, present and Yet to come.

Clinical radiology·2024
Same author

Empowering nurses and midwives: the evidence-base for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE†.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Evidence-based guideline: unexplained infertility†.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia associated with ACVRL1 mutation: a case report.

Journal of medical case reports·2022
Same author

Technique and outcome of day case laparoscopic hiatus hernia surgery for small and large hernias: a five-year retrospective review from a high-volume UK centre.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020
Same author

Correlation between sonographic follow-up of follicular growth, serum and salivary estradiol in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (IVF/ICSI).

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2019
Same journal

Abstracts of selected papers from the current literature.

Abdominal imaging·2016
Same journal

How the radiologist can add value in the evaluation of the pre- and post-surgical pancreas.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Erratum to: Hot spleen: hypervascular lesions of the spleen.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Cross-sectional imaging, with surgical correlation, of patients presenting with complications after remote bariatric surgery without bowel obstruction.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

The ability of 18F-choline PET/CT to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

T1-hyperintense renal lesions: can high signal predict lack of enhancement?

Abdominal imaging·2015
See all related articles

Digital subtraction is not beneficial for defecography (pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction imaging). This technique, intended to improve visualization, was found to be unhelpful or even detrimental in most cases studied.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders

Background:

  • Defecography is a standard imaging technique for evaluating pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction.
  • Measurements in defecography often rely on bony landmarks like ischial tuberosities, which can be difficult to visualize.
  • Digital subtraction was proposed to eliminate the need for precise bony landmark identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility and effectiveness of digital subtraction in defecography.
  • To determine if digital subtraction improves or hinders the diagnostic accuracy of defecography.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-five defecogram studies were recorded in both non-subtracted and subtracted formats.
  • Studies were interpreted blindly by clinicians to compare diagnoses and measurements between the two formats.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The benefit, hindrance, and feasibility of digital subtraction were assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • Digital subtraction provided limited benefit in only one case.
    • The technique was impossible to perform in one case and added no useful information in 18 cases.
    • Visualization of abnormalities was hindered in five cases due to digital subtraction.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital subtraction is generally unhelpful in defecography due to overlapping densities and patient movement.
    • The technique does not improve diagnostic accuracy and can impede the visualization of pelvic floor and anorectal abnormalities.
    • Standard defecography without subtraction is recommended for investigating pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction.