Related Experiment Videos
Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique
1Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas, Houston 77225, USA.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
|March 1, 1995
Summary
The bootstrap method underestimates confidence levels in phylogenetics unless critically evaluated. A new complete-and-partial bootstrap technique offers unbiased confidence estimates for phylogenetic trees.
Area of Science:
- Phylogenetics
- Statistical methods
- Computational biology
Background:
- The bootstrap is a common statistical method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic trees.
- Existing bootstrap tests may have reduced power and underestimate confidence levels, especially with multiple alternative topologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the bootstrap method in estimating confidence limits for phylogenies.
- To propose a novel technique for obtaining unbiased confidence estimates in phylogenetic analysis.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of bootstrap test power against Felsenstein's C and S tests.
- Development and application of the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique.
- Utilizing a multinomial model for estimating confidence levels and competing topologies.
Main Results:
- Standard bootstrap proportions underestimate confidence levels when three or more alternative topologies exist.
- The degree of underestimation increases with the number of competing topologies.
- The complete-and-partial bootstrap technique provides an unbiased estimate of confidence levels.
Conclusions:
- The standard bootstrap method requires careful selection of critical values to avoid underestimation of confidence.
- The complete-and-partial bootstrap technique offers a robust and unbiased approach for confidence estimation in phylogenetics.
- This new method is compatible with maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining tree reconstruction.