Duels without obvious sense: counteracting inductions involved in body wall muscle development in the Caenorhabditis...

During the first four cleavage rounds of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo, five somatic founder cells AB, MS, E, C and D are born, which later form the tissues of the embryo. The classical criterion for a cell-autonomous specification of a tissue is the capability of primordial cells to produce this tissue in isolation from the remainder of the embryo. By this criterion, the somatic founder cells MS, C and D develop cell-autonomously. Laser ablation experiments, however, reveal that within the embryonic context these blastomeres form a network of duelling cellular interactions. During normal development, the blastomere D inhibits muscle specification in the MS and the C lineage inhibits muscle specification in the D lineage. These inhibitory interactions are counteracted by two activating inductions. As described before the inhibition of body wall muscle in MS is counteracted by an activating signal from the ABa lineage. Body wall muscle in the D lineage is induced by MS descendants, which suppress an inhibitory activity of the C lineage. The interaction between the D and the MS lineage occurs through the C lineage. An interesting feature of these cell-cell interactions is that they do not serve to discriminate between equivalent cells but are permissive or nonpermissive inductions. No evidence was found that the C-derived body wall muscle also depends on an induction, which suggests that possibly three different pathways coexist in the early embryo to specify body wall muscle, two of which are, in different ways, influenced by cell-cell interactions and a third that is autonomous. This work supplies evidence that cells may acquire transient states during embryogenesis that influence the specification of other cells in the embryo. These states, however, may not be reflected in the developmental potentials of the cells themselves. They can only be scored indirectly by their action on the specification of other cells in the embryo. Blastomeres that behave cell-autonomously in isolation are nevertheless subjected to cell-cell interactions in the embryonic context. Why this should be is an intriguing question. The classical notion has been that blastomeres are specified autonomously in nematodes. In recent years, it was established that at least five inductions are required to determine the AB descendants of C. elegans, whereas the P1 descendants have been typically viewed to develop more autonomously. It appears now that inductions also play a major role during the determination of P1-derived blastomeres.