Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Augmentative and alternative communication: past, present and future

N Alm1, P Parnes

  • 1Dundee University, Scotland, UK.

Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica : Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing AAC technologies: a personal story and philosophy.

European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London·1994
Same author

Facilitating conversation for non-speaking people with multiple handicaps.

International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation·1993
Same author

Development of an integrated wheelchair tray system for augmentative communication.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·1989
Same author

Discourse analysis and pragmatics in the design of a conversation prosthesis.

Journal of medical engineering & technology·1989
Same author

A community-centered program for heroin addicts.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1971
Same author

Adolescent daughters of emotionally ill mothers: their psychosocial and physical adaptive behavior.

Nursing Research Conference·1970
Same journal

Navigating support pathways for children with Developmental Language Disorder in Chile: caregivers' perspectives across health and education services.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
Same journal

The topography of disfluency in spoken language: a scoping review.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
Same journal

Erratum.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
Same journal

Validation and Reliability of Arabic Brief Version of the Unhelpful Thoughts and Beliefs About Stuttering (UTBAS-6) Scales.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
Same journal

Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: What does childhood bilingualism mean to clinicians?

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
Same journal

Comparing Speech Therapy Service Delivery Models in Iranian Primary Schools: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This article reviews the history and future of communication tools for individuals with severe speech impairments. It highlights that while technology is evolving rapidly, effective support depends as much on social policy and user needs as it does on hardware. The authors call for global collaboration to improve services and accessibility for all users.

Area of Science:

  • Augmentative and alternative communication research within assistive technology
  • Public health policy and clinical linguistics

Background:

No prior work had fully synthesized the evolution of tools for individuals with severe speech impairments. That uncertainty drove a need to examine how various stakeholders shaped this field. Prior research has shown that clinicians and families play a vital role in system design. This gap motivated an analysis of how hardware advancements intersect with human requirements. It was already known that communication is inherently complex and multifaceted. Many existing systems fail to address the diverse needs of the population. That reality prompted a look at the balance between high-tech and low-tech solutions. No prior work had resolved the tension between technical innovation and policy implementation.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to examine the past, present, and future of communication support for severely impaired individuals. This study addresses the motivation to understand how various stakeholders influence system design. The researchers seek to clarify the relationship between technological advancement and human needs. This work explores why technical development alone cannot solve complex communication challenges. The authors intend to highlight the importance of policy in providing effective services. This study addresses the need for global collaboration to improve outcomes for users. The researchers aim to demonstrate that simple techniques are often as effective as complex ones. This work provides a framework for future progress in the field.

Keywords:
speech impairmentdisability servicescommunication technologyinclusive policy

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that effective support relies on balancing sophisticated hardware with policy implementation. While technology provides new possibilities, the authors argue that meeting user needs and addressing the complex nature of human interaction often requires non-technical strategies, distinguishing this from purely hardware-focused approaches.

The authors identify clinicians, users, their families, and manufacturers as key contributors. This group differs from the researchers themselves, who synthesize these inputs to frame the field's development, highlighting a collaborative model rather than a top-down technical approach.

The authors suggest that international cooperation is necessary for progress. This requirement spans interventions, technologies, and services, contrasting with isolated national efforts that may lack the scale or shared expertise needed to address complex communication impairments effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involved synthesizing perspectives from multiple stakeholders including clinicians and families. The authors evaluated the historical trajectory of communication systems to identify current trends. This analysis focused on the intersection of hardware development and human requirements. The review approach examined how cost and size reductions influence system accessibility. Researchers assessed the role of policy in the provision of services for impaired individuals. The study design prioritized a holistic view of human interaction over purely technical metrics. The authors compared the efficacy of sophisticated devices against simpler, non-technical methods. This review approach synthesized international data to highlight common challenges across different regions.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that communication systems have evolved through diverse input from manufacturers and users. The authors report that computer-based tools are becoming more powerful while simultaneously decreasing in size. Key findings from the literature demonstrate that many effective techniques do not require advanced hardware. The researchers note that policy implementation frequently dictates the success of service provision more than technical specifications. Key findings from the literature reveal that some users have achieved international recognition for their work in the field. The authors highlight that the benefits of these systems for impaired individuals are enormous. Key findings from the literature suggest that the field remains a new and exciting area of study. The researchers identify a persistent gap between technological potential and actual service delivery.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that global cooperation remains a prerequisite for advancing this domain. Synthesis and implications suggest that interventions must prioritize the actual requirements of the people using these systems. Future progress depends on aligning technological growth with robust service frameworks. The researchers suggest that policy implementation often outweighs hardware development in terms of real-world impact. They argue that the field faces significant challenges that require collective international effort. The authors conclude that the potential benefits for users are immense. They emphasize that communication support is not merely a technical endeavor. The review highlights that success requires integrating diverse perspectives from families and manufacturers.

The authors treat computer-based technology as a secondary tool. They note that while decreasing costs and size offer new possibilities, these advancements are only effective when integrated with social policies, unlike a purely technical view that equates progress solely with hardware power.

The authors measure the success of the field by the ability to meet the real needs of users. This phenomenon is contrasted with the mere existence of sophisticated devices, which the researchers argue do not automatically guarantee effective communication outcomes.

The researchers propose that the field is currently in an exciting, nascent stage. They imply that the future depends on moving beyond technical questions to address the broader societal and service-related challenges that currently limit access for impaired individuals.