Related Experiment Videos
RBC transfusion in the ICU. Is there a reason?
H L Corwin1, K C Parsonnet, A Gettinger
1Critical Care Service, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate RBC transfusion practice in the ICU.
Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Setting:
Multidisciplinary ICU in a tertiary care center.
Patients:
All patients admitted to the ICU with a length of stay of greater than 1 week.
Results:
A total of 23% of all patients admitted to the ICU had a length of stay of greater than 1 week (19.6 +/- 1.6 days). Of these patients, 85% received blood transfusions (9.5 +/- 0.8 U per patient). These transfusions were not solely a function of acute blood loss. Patients were transfused a constant 2 to 3 U/wk. Patients receiving blood transfusions were phlebotomized on average 61 to 70 mL per day. Phlebotomy accounted for 49% of the variation in amount of RBCs transfused. No indication for blood transfusion was identified for 29% of transfusion events. A low hematocrit (< 25%) was the only identifiable indication in an additional 19% of events. Almost one third of all RBCs transfused were without a clear transfusion indication.
Conclusion:
The long-term ICU population receive a large number of blood transfusions. Phlebotomy contributes significantly to these transfusions. There is no clear indication for a large number of the blood transfusions given. Many blood transfusions appear to be administered because of an arbitrary "transfusion trigger" rather than a physiologic need for blood. Blood conservation and adherence to transfusion guidelines could significantly reduce RBC transfusion in the ICU.