Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CQI case study: reducing medication errors

R G Carey1, J L Teeters

  • 1Clinical Effectiveness Research, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring health care quality. How do you know your care has improved?

Evaluation & the health professions·2000
Same author

Measuring for improvement: from Toyota to thoracic surgery.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·1999
Same author

Improving warfarin anticoagulation therapy in a community health system.

Pharmacy practice management quarterly·1998
Same author

Evaluating the physician office visit: in pursuit of a valid and reliable measure of quality improvement efforts.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·1995
Same author

Measuring quality: report cards get low grades.

QRC advisor·1995
Same author

Measuring the success of CQI.

Healthcare executive·1994
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles

A quality improvement team reduced medication errors using statistical process control (SPC) tools. This involved developing an IV training module, with control charts effectively measuring intervention impact and identifying areas for further improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety
  • Clinical Process Management

Background:

  • A Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee established a continuous quality improvement (CQI) team.
  • The team focused on reducing medication errors at Lutheran General Hospital.
  • Statistical process control (SPC) tools were employed to assess improvement efforts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the formation of a CQI team.
  • To illustrate the application of SPC tools in reducing medication errors.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of an IV training module for nurses.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an intravenous (IV) training module in collaboration with the nursing quality council.
  • Utilization of run charts, Pareto charts, and control charts (p-charts and np-charts).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of charts to identify improvement opportunities, strategize interventions, and measure outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • The IV training module effectively decreased the average number of medication errors per month.
    • Run charts provided preliminary variation analysis.
    • Pareto charts helped prioritize areas for maximum impact.
    • P-charts and np-charts precisely identified special causes and measured intervention effectiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • P-charts and np-charts are superior to run charts for identifying special causes and quantifying intervention impact.
    • Pareto charts are valuable for process optimization by highlighting key areas.
    • Np-charts offer a user-friendly alternative to p-charts when control limits are stable.
    • Np-charts validated intervention success and pinpointed specific areas of failure.