Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implementing a computer-assisted appropriateness review using DRG 182/183

C Henzler1, J J Harper

  • 1Forbes Health System, Monroeville, PA 15146-3592, USA.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolated impact of liver herniation on outcome in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia - A matched-pair analysis based on fetal MRI relative lung volume.

European journal of radiology·2018
Same author

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast Enhanced Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Angioinvasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Patients.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Rhizopus and tongue depressors.

Lancet (London, England)·1996
Same author

Pneumonia mortality reduction and quality improvement in a community hospital.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same author

Biotypes of Haemophilus influenzae that are associated with noninvasive infections.

Journal of clinical microbiology·1991
Same author

Natural killer cells in viral arthritis.

Clinical and experimental immunology·1987
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles

Redesigning appropriateness reviews using computer-assisted methods improved efficiency and staff engagement. This quality improvement initiative enhanced data analysis capabilities without additional costs or new technology.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Quality Improvement
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Patient outcomes and care processes are increasingly emphasized for performance measurement.
  • Appropriateness reviews remain crucial for evaluating healthcare services like admissions and procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To redesign the appropriateness review process using a computer-assisted methodology.
  • To leverage existing electronic clinical data for improved review efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a computer-assisted methodology for appropriateness reviews at Forbes Regional Hospital.
  • Utilized electronically recorded clinical data from state-mandated discharge reporting.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Over 90% of gastrointestinal/esophagitis admissions were appropriate based on manual review.
  • The redesign reduced review time and costs, enhancing data analysis capabilities.
  • Increased medical staff enthusiasm for quality improvement projects and familiarity with information systems.

    • Conclusions:

    • Computer-assisted appropriateness reviews can be effectively implemented using existing data and systems.
    • This approach enhances efficiency, reduces costs, and fosters greater staff involvement in quality initiatives.
    • The methodology is adaptable for future quality improvement projects across different conditions.