Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Moist wound healing: the clinical perspective

M D Kerstein

    Ostomy/Wound Management
    |August 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary

    Modern wound dressings significantly improve healing and patient outcomes. Moisture-retentive dressings, compared to gauze, reduce healing time, infection rates, pain, and costs, but variations exist among them.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Moist wound healing: current concepts and applications.

    Surgical technology international·2011
    Same author

    Lower-extremity wounds. 1: Vascular disease assessment.

    Journal of wound care·2003
    Same author

    Lower-extremity wounds. 2. Management options.

    Journal of wound care·2003
    Same author

    Options for nonsurgical debridement of necrotic wounds.

    Advances in skin & wound care·2002
    Same author

    Current controversies in shock and resuscitation.

    The Surgical clinics of North America·2002
    Same author

    Peripheral vascular disease intervention in patients with end-stage renal disease: few complications in those treated with peritoneal dialysis.

    Southern medical journal·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Wound healing and regenerative medicine
    • Biomaterials and medical device technology

    Background:

    • Wound dressings are critical for healing and patient quality of life.
    • Topical treatments impact reepithelialization, granulation, tissue debridement, infection, pH, and pain.
    • Conventional gauze is a common but often suboptimal wound care method.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of different wound dressings on healing outcomes.
    • To compare the efficacy of moisture-retentive dressings against conventional gauze.
    • To inform evidence-based treatment decisions in wound care.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of clinical studies comparing various wound dressing types.
    • Analysis of effects on healing time, infection rates, pain, and cost.
    • Assessment of differences among moisture-retentive wound dressing technologies.

    Main Results:

    • Most moisture-retentive dressings outperform conventional gauze in healing.
    • Significant reductions observed in healing time, infection rates, and patient pain.
    • Moisture-retentive dressings also demonstrate a lower cost of care.
    • Variability in performance exists among different moisture-retentive dressings.

    Conclusions:

    • Moisture-retentive wound dressings offer superior outcomes compared to traditional gauze.
    • Evidence supports the use of advanced dressings for improved wound healing.
    • Clinical decisions should prioritize evidence from controlled studies on wound care interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos