Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization

J Piper1, D Rutovitz, D Sudar

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco 94143-0808, USA.

Cytometry
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrated RNA-seq and DNase-seq analyses identify phenotype-specific BMP4 signaling in breast cancer.

BMC genomics·2017
Same author

The impact of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) on breast cancer metastasis in a mouse xenograft model.

Cancer letters·2016
Same author

Finnish Fanconi anemia mutations and hereditary predisposition to breast and prostate cancer.

Clinical genetics·2014
Same author

The impact of lobular and ductal breast cancer histology on the metastatic behavior and long term survival of breast cancer patients.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2013
Same author

Genomic copy number alterations in clear cell renal carcinoma: associations with case characteristics and mechanisms of VHL gene inactivation.

Oncogenesis·2013
Same author

Response to letter by Pulsipher et al.

Leukemia·2010
Same journal

Measurement of the distribution of red blood cell deformability using an automated rheoscope.

Cytometry·2002
Same journal

Flow cytometric-based isolation of nucleated erythroid cells during maturation: an approach to cell surface antigen studies.

Cytometry·2002
Same journal

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping test for staging/monitoring neuroblastoma patients.

Cytometry·2002
Same journal

Determination of bronchoalveolar lavage leukocyte populations by flow cytometry in patients investigated for respiratory disease.

Cytometry·2002
Same journal

Multicenter clinical experience with flow cytometric method for fetomaternal hemorrhage detection.

Cytometry·2002
Same journal

Separation of live cells in different phases of the cell cycle for gene expression analysis.

Cytometry·2002
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study presents image processing and analysis techniques for quantitative comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). These methods enable accurate DNA copy number variation detection for genomic research.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to detect chromosomal copy number variations.
  • Accurate quantitative analysis of CGH data is crucial for understanding genomic alterations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate novel image-processing and analysis techniques for quantitative CGH.
  • To enhance the accuracy and reliability of CGH data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • The developed techniques include chromosome segmentation, intensity normalization, and background corrections.
  • Fluorescence intensity profiles and ratio profiles are calculated along chromosome lengths.
  • Averaging profiles from multiple chromosome copies reduces noise, and confidence intervals are calculated.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Techniques were evaluated using normal genomic DNAs and cell lines with known copy number changes.
  • The methods demonstrated the ability to accurately measure DNA copy number ratios.
  • Sensitivity limits of CGH analysis were investigated through simulation.

Conclusions:

  • The presented image-processing and analysis techniques provide a robust framework for quantitative CGH.
  • These methods improve the reliability of detecting DNA copy number variations.
  • Guidelines for CGH data interpretation and future development areas are provided.