Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guide to identifying and correcting decision making errors in mental disability practice

J Rabinowitz1

  • 1Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Usefulness of interim analyses in portending study results in antipsychotic and antidepressant trials.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2015
Same author

Myocardial gene delivery using molecular cardiac surgery with recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors in vivo.

Gene therapy·2011
Same author

Pathways to functional outcomes in schizophrenia: the role of premorbid functioning, negative symptoms and intelligence.

Schizophrenia research·2009
Same author

Trajectories and antecedents of treatment response over time in early-episode psychosis.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2008
Same author

Validity of the premorbid adjustment scale.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2007
Same author

Accuracy of self-reported premorbid functioning in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2007
Same journal

Posttraumatic stress disorder, pulp fiction, and the press.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Trading forensic and family commitments.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

A comparison of treatment of paraphilias with three serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective study.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Patients' attitudes toward having been forcibly medicated.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

A clinical study of competency in psychiatric inpatients.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Postconcussional disorder and loss of consciousness.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
See all related articles

This guide helps practitioners avoid decision-making errors by applying the scientific method. A "lab report" method is proposed for more rational forensic evaluations and improved clinical judgment.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Decision-making errors are common in practice.
  • These errors often stem from deviations from the scientific method.
  • Judgmental inaccuracies are evident in critical clinical areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a practical and theoretical guide for identifying and reducing decision-making errors.
  • To present common judgment errors as deviations from the scientific method.
  • To introduce a novel method for improving rational and scientific evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Inventorying common decision-making and judgment errors.
  • Presenting evidence of judgmental inaccuracies.
  • Introducing the "lab report" method for forensic evaluations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reviewing the scientific method and its application in clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • The "lab report" method promotes a structured approach to evaluations.
    • This method involves clear hypotheses, operationalized measures, systematic data collection, and feedback.
    • The scientific method can be applied more effectively in clinical settings.

    Conclusions:

    • The "lab report" method offers a way to mitigate decision-making errors.
    • Adopting a scientific approach enhances the rationality of forensic evaluations.
    • Improving the application of the scientific method benefits clinical practice.