Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bootstraps taxometrics. Solving the classification problem in psychopathology

P E Meehl1

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455-0344, USA.

The American Psychologist
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Taxometric analysis, a mathematical approach, determines if psychopathology is categorical or dimensional. This method provides reliable estimates for diagnostic systems, favoring empirical data over clinical consensus for revisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection Of Biological Sex: An Empirical Test Of Cluster Methods.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Hunt-Minnesota Test for Organic Brain Damage in cases of functional depression.

The Journal of applied psychology·2010
Same author

Profile analysis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in differential diagnosis.

The Journal of applied psychology·2010
Same author

The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.

The Journal of applied psychology·2010
Same author

Ethical and political aspects of applied psychology.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2010
Same author

Primary and secondary hypohedonia.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychopathology research
  • Applied mathematics
  • Quantitative psychology

Background:

  • Classification in psychopathology is a fundamental empirical question concerning latent structure.
  • Current diagnostic systems often rely on conventions or clinical impressions rather than empirical data.
  • Distinguishing between taxonic (categorical) and nontaxonic (dimensional) structures is crucial for accurate classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate taxometric procedures for determining the latent structure of psychopathology.
  • To provide methods for estimating key parameters such as base rates and validity/false-positive rates.
  • To advocate for taxometric analysis as a basis for revising diagnostic systems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two taxometric procedures: MAMBAC and MAXCOV-HITMAX, for independent testing of the taxonic hypothesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed 'coherent cut kinetics,' a general approach involving multiple consistency tests for robust inference.
  • Required no gold standard criterion, using fallible diagnostic indicators only for initial candidate identification.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that taxometric procedures can accurately estimate taxon base rates and latent means.
    • Showed satisfactory accuracy in estimating valid and false-positive rates for various diagnostic cut-offs.
    • Provided confidence in inferring taxonic structure and numerical accuracy through multiple consistency tests.

    Conclusions:

    • Taxometric analysis offers a rigorous, data-driven method for classifying psychopathology.
    • These mathematical procedures provide reliable estimates essential for diagnostic system development.
    • Future revisions of diagnostic systems should prioritize taxometric findings over non-taxometric or committee-based decisions.