Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial localization: tests of a two-process model

J J Adam1, F G Paas, J Ekering

  • 1Department of Movement Sciences, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Experimental Brain Research
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allocentric coding in ventral and dorsal routes during real-time reaching: Evidence from imaging-guided multi-site brain stimulation.

Behavioural brain research·2015
Same author

An invariant for timing of saccades during visual search.

Vision research·2005
Same author

Controlled visuomotor preparation deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Neuropsychology·2005
Same author

Physiological, biochemical and psychological markers of strenuous training-induced fatigue.

International journal of sports medicine·2005
Same author

Different visual search strategies in stationary and moving radial patterns.

Vision research·2003
Same author

The timing of sequences of saccades in visual search.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2002
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

This study supports a two-process model of visual localization, involving attention shifts and eye movements. Response methods and backward masking characteristics did not alter localization performance, confirming the model's robustness.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The two-process model proposes localization performance relies on attention shifts for coarse information and saccadic eye movements for fine-tuning.
  • Previous research utilized indirect cursor-based responses, necessitating further investigation into response modality effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the two-process model of visual localization.
  • To investigate the impact of different response methods (pointing vs. cursor) on localization performance.
  • To examine the influence of backward masking stimulus characteristics on localization accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared direct pointing responses with indirect cursor control responses for target localization.
  • Experiment 2: Manipulated backward masking conditions (long-duration, short-duration, no mask) to assess effects on localization at varying stimulus onset asynchronies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Localization performance was unaffected by the response method (pointing vs. cursor).
  • A long-duration mask induced both interference and facilitation depending on the interval between target and mask onset.
  • A short-duration mask primarily caused interference at short intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Findings are consistent with the two-process model of localization performance.
  • The model's predictions hold true irrespective of the response modality used.
  • Backward masking characteristics significantly modulate localization performance, supporting the temporal dynamics proposed by the model.