Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nursing schools: how are they ranked?

P A Chamings, M V Hargett, R S Parrish

    Nurse Educator
    |January 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Yellow fever vaccine inactivation studies.

    Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1896)·2010
    Same author

    Influence of T cell depletion method on circulating gammadelta T cell reconstitution and potential role in the graft-versus-leukemia effect.

    Cytotherapy·2009
    Same author

    Quality of life and lymphedema following breast cancer.

    Lymphology·2008
    Same author

    Influence of allogeneic blood transfusion on clinical outcome during radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix.

    Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2003
    Same author

    Effective conflict management begins with knowing your style.

    Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization·2003
    Same author

    Epstein-Barr virus-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disorder following mismatched related T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation.

    Bone marrow transplantation·2002

    Nursing school rankings are changing. This study compares recent survey results with past nursing school rankings over nine years, revealing significant shifts in how deans and researchers evaluate programs.

    Area of Science:

    • Nursing Education Research
    • Higher Education Administration

    Background:

    • Assessing the quality of nursing programs is crucial for students and institutions.
    • Previous nursing school rankings provide a historical context for current evaluations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the latest survey data on nursing school rankings.
    • To compare current rankings with those from the past nine years.
    • To identify significant changes in how nursing schools are evaluated by deans and researchers.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducting a survey of deans and researchers in nursing.
    • Analyzing and comparing ranking data from multiple time points.
    • Identifying trends and shifts in evaluation criteria over nine years.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The most recent survey reveals shifts in the perceived quality of nursing schools.
    • Comparison with previous rankings highlights significant changes over the past decade.
    • Specific institutions and program types may have experienced notable changes in their ranking positions.

    Conclusions:

    • Nursing school rankings are dynamic and evolve over time.
    • Deans and researchers' perceptions of nursing programs have changed.
    • Understanding these shifts is important for stakeholders in nursing education.