Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic urologic surgery. The financial realities

H N Winfield1, J F Donovan, S A Troxel

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic urology procedures show higher initial costs but lower overall expenses due to shorter recovery times. Financial analysis reveals long-term savings potential with minimally invasive urologic surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of curare in electric convulsion therapy.

Lancet (London, England)·2010
Same author

Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology·2007
Same author

Physiologic effect of nifedipine and tamsulosin on contractility of distal ureter.

Journal of endourology·2006
Same author

A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology.

Current urology reports·2002
Same author

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of renal malignancy.

Journal of endourology·2001
Same author

Laparoscopic lymph node dissection: pelvic and retroperitoneal.

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2001

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Urology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly prevalent in urology since 1990.
  • Open surgery remains a common alternative for many urologic procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a financial analysis comparing three common urolaparoscopic procedures with their open surgery counterparts.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open urologic surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative financial analysis of intraoperative and postoperative costs.
  • Inclusion of convalescence period costs for three common urolaparoscopic procedures and their open counterparts.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic surgery incurs higher intraoperative costs compared to open surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Postoperative expenses are significantly lower for laparoscopic procedures.
  • Shorter convalescence periods associated with laparoscopy contribute to overall cost reduction.

    • Conclusions:

    • While initial costs are higher, laparoscopic urology offers potential long-term financial benefits.
    • The reduced recovery time following laparoscopic surgery is a critical factor in its overall financial viability.
    • Healthcare providers should consider the comprehensive financial impact, including recovery, when choosing between laparoscopic and open urologic procedures.