Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion

A A Cota1, R S Longman, C R Evans

  • 1Correctional Service of Canada (Parole), London, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenges in confirming the position of a central venous catheter in the presence of an arterio-venous haemodialysis fistula.

Anaesthesia reports·2023
Same author

Body composition, gastrointestinal, and reproductive differences between broiler breeders fed using everyday or skip-a-day rearing programs.

Poultry science·2023
Same author

Joint Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-associated Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Stratifies Therapeutic Response.

Gastro hep advances·2022
Same author

Recruitment to anaesthesia training posts during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Anaesthesia·2022
Same author

Observational study of pre-operative intravenous iron given to anaemic patients before elective cardiac surgery.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

Evaluation of a novel ultraviolet C irradiation locker for microbial sterilization of hospital laboratory coats.

The Journal of hospital infection·2020
Same journal

Profiles of Early Life Stress and Their Interaction With Proximal Stress in Early Adulthood: A Person-Centered Approach.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Single Versus Multiple Intimate Partner Violence Relationships: Current Severity of Psychological Distress Among Romantic Partners.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Psychological Distress Profiles in Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss During Subsequent Early Pregnancy and Their Association With Sleep Characteristics: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Cluster Analysis Based on the Millon Test Scores.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring Reasoning Biases Associated With Psychosis in Borderline Personality Disorder Using Self-Report and Objective Measures.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Maladaptive Perfectionism and Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Longitudinal Moderated Mediation Model of Hopelessness and Self-Concept Clarity.

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
See all related articles

Understanding group cohesion is key, but its measurement is debated. This review critically examines factor analysis in cohesion research, offering recommendations for future studies.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Group cohesion is a fundamental concept for explaining group behavior.
  • Significant debate exists regarding the conceptualization and measurement of group cohesion, particularly its dimensionality.
  • Factor analysis is frequently employed to investigate the underlying structure of cohesion and its associated measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review the application of factor analysis in understanding group cohesion.
  • To provide recommendations for future research utilizing factor analysis in cohesion studies.
  • To highlight the strengths and limitations of using factor analysis to explore the construct of cohesion.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies using factor analysis to examine group cohesion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical analysis of methodological approaches and findings in selected studies.
  • Synthesis of recommendations for best practices in factor analytic research on cohesion.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified inconsistencies in the application and interpretation of factor analysis in cohesion research.
    • Highlighted common weaknesses in previous factor analytic studies of cohesion.
    • Recognized the utility of factor analysis when applied rigorously to cohesion measurement.

    Conclusions:

    • Factor analysis remains a valuable tool for elucidating the dimensionality of group cohesion.
    • Clearer theoretical frameworks and robust methodologies are needed for future factor analytic work on cohesion.
    • Addressing the identified weaknesses can enhance the validity and reliability of cohesion research.