Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical problems in psychiatric everyday practice

H Helmchen1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

The Japanese Journal of Psychiatry and Neurology
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[A critical consideration of alternative methods is useful].

Der Nervenarzt·2019
Same author

[The role of psychopharmacotherapy in the development of social psychiatry in Germany].

Der Nervenarzt·2017
Same author

[Psychiatrists between oath to secrecy and duty to warn].

Der Nervenarzt·2016
Same author

[Research on humans suffering from dementia].

Der Nervenarzt·2015
Same author

[Physicians conscience and Zeitgeist].

Der Nervenarzt·2014
Same author

[Bonhoeffer's position on sterilization of the mentally ill].

Der Nervenarzt·2014
Same journal

Expression of ganglioside GD3 in choroid plexus.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
Same journal

Effects of AETT-induced neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis on learning ability in rats.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
Same journal

Effects of psychotropic drugs on impairment of acquisition of shuttle avoidance produced by pretreatment with pairs of tone signal and shock in mice.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
Same journal

A method for analyzing biological rhythms in healthy subjects and depressed patients.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
Same journal

Transient and all-night effects of passing truck noise on the number of sleep spindle.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
Same journal

An autopsied case of acute lymphocytic meningoencephalitis with a long clinical course: special reference to CT, MR, SPECT and neuropathological findings.

The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology·1994
See all related articles

Evaluating psychiatric decisions requires balancing patient autonomy and welfare. Assessing capacity for consent, especially when mental illness conflicts with well-being, presents ethical challenges for psychiatrists.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Patient self-determination is a constitutionally protected right, crucial in psychiatric decision-making.
  • Mental illness can impair or suspend an individual's capacity to provide informed consent.
  • Balancing patient welfare with their expressed will is a complex ethical consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical challenges in psychiatric decision-making concerning patient consent and self-determination.
  • To highlight the difficulties in assessing a patient's capacity to consent when mental disease is present.
  • To examine situations where a patient's will conflicts with their welfare.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of psychiatric decision-making processes.
Keywords:
Mental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case examples illustrating conflicts between patient will and welfare.
  • Discussion of the impact of psychiatric treatments on patient autonomy.

    • Main Results:

    • Recognizing, assessing, and evaluating the extent and relevance of impaired consent capacity is often difficult for psychiatrists.
    • Situations where a patient's will opposes their welfare pose significant ethical dilemmas.
    • Psychiatric therapies, while aiming to restore autonomy, may temporarily curtail self-determination.

    Conclusions:

    • Psychiatrists must navigate complex ethical terrain when patient autonomy and welfare are in conflict.
    • Continuous awareness and careful consideration of these issues are vital in daily psychiatric practice.
    • Ethical frameworks must accommodate the nuances of impaired consent and the impact of treatment on self-determination.