Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between manual and computer-based methods for clinical learning assignments

E Howse1, B Smith, C A Perkin

  • 1School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Computers in Nursing
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychotropic drugs in breast milk: no evidence for adverse effects on prepulse modulation of startle reflex or on cognitive level in infants.

Developmental psychobiology·1998
Same author

An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator-telemeter for control of paralyzed muscle.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1998
Same author

Fluoxetine in breast-milk and developmental outcome of breast-fed infants.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·1998
Same author

Human brain tumors and exposure to metal and non-metal elements: a case-control study.

Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer·1998
Same author

Rehospitalisation for asthma within 12 months: unequal rates on the basis of gender in two hospitals.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·1998
Same author

Asthma prevalence, morbidity and management practices in South Australia, 1992-1995.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·1998
Same journal

Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

Computers in nursing·2002
See all related articles

A computer matching program significantly improved accuracy and speed for assigning nursing students to clinical settings compared to manual methods. Human judgment remains crucial, but technology enhances decision-making efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Education
  • Health Informatics
  • Educational Technology

Background:

  • Clinical placements are essential for nursing education.
  • Traditional manual assignment methods are time-consuming and may not optimize student-setting matches.
  • Evaluating efficient and accurate methods for clinical assignment is critical.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and speed of a computer-based assignment method versus a manual method for nursing students' clinical learning settings.
  • To determine the effectiveness of a computer program utilizing decision rules for matching students with clinical placements.

Main Methods:

  • Two assignment methods were compared: manual (student preferences, faculty experience) and computer-based (decision rules, numerical ratings of student capabilities and setting demands).

Related Experiment Videos

  • The computer program processed ratings to find optimal student-setting matches.
  • A randomized computer assignment was used as an additional comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • The computer-based method achieved a superior fit between students and clinical settings compared to the manual method.
    • A randomized computer assignment was less effective than the manual method, highlighting the importance of human input in assignment logic.
    • The computer assignment process was significantly faster (minutes/seconds) than the manual process (hours).

    Conclusions:

    • Computer matching programs can substantially improve the quality and efficiency of clinical assignment decisions for nursing students.
    • While human judgment is vital, tailored computer algorithms enhance decision-making and reduce resource expenditure.
    • Optimizing clinical placement allocation through technology benefits both students and educational institutions.