Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intravenous contrast media reactions: how do radiologists react?

D J Sadler1, F Parrish, A Coulthard

  • 1University Department of Radiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Clinical Radiology
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automating Quantitative Measures of an Established Conventional MRI Scoring System for Preterm-Born Infants Scanned between 29 and 47 Weeks' Postmenstrual Age.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

<i>Reply</i>.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same author

A combined tract-based spatial statistics and voxel-based morphometry study of the first MRI scan after diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with subgroup analysis.

Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie·2017
Same author

Erratum to: Training guidelines for endovascular stroke intervention: an international multi-society consensus document.

Neuroradiology·2017
Same author

Validation of an MRI Brain Injury and Growth Scoring System in Very Preterm Infants Scanned at 29- to 35-Week Postmenstrual Age.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same author

Training Guidelines for Endovascular Stroke Intervention: An International Multi-Society Consensus Document.

Interventional neurology·2016
Same journal

Semiautomated magnetic resonance imaging-based breast density measurement from routine sequences: comparison with mammography.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Where can we improve? An evaluation of discrepancies between radiology resident and consultant reports for noncontrast head computed tomography (NCHCT) scans in the emergency department at a tertiary care centre.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy: neuroradiology considerations and challenges.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Weight-based contrast media volume reduction in lower limb computed tomography angiography: a prospective feasibility study.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of flat panel computed tomography for acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear medicine techniques in gynaecological malignancy: a review of best practice.

Clinical radiology·2026
See all related articles

Radiologists have good knowledge of minor contrast media reactions but poor understanding of severe reactions. Management knowledge decreases with seniority, suggesting a need for simplified severe reaction guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Safety

Background:

  • The Royal College of Radiologists issued guidelines for managing intravenous contrast media reactions.
  • Assessing current understanding and management practices among radiologists is crucial for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate radiologists' comprehension of intravenous contrast media reactions.
  • To assess the effectiveness of their management strategies for adverse events.
  • To identify gaps in knowledge, particularly concerning severe reactions.

Main Methods:

  • A confidential questionnaire was distributed to radiologists in the Northern Region.
  • Response rate was 60% (61 out of 101 radiologists).
  • Data collected focused on understanding and management of contrast media reactions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Radiologists demonstrated good knowledge regarding minor contrast media reactions.
  • Understanding of the treatment protocols for severe reactions was found to be inadequate.
  • A negative correlation was observed between radiological seniority and knowledge of optimal management strategies.

Conclusions:

  • There is a significant deficit in radiologists' understanding of how to manage severe contrast media reactions.
  • Simplified treatment guidelines, specifically targeting severe reactions, are recommended.
  • Further education and updated protocols may be necessary to improve patient care outcomes.