Related Experiment Videos
Tear flow in cyclosporine recipients
S L Palmer1, P A Bowen, K Green
1Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Ophthalmology
|January 1, 1995
Summary
Oral cyclosporine significantly increases tear flow in kidney transplant recipients. This study found cyclosporine enhanced tear production compared to azathioprine and control groups, suggesting a direct effect on lacrimal function.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Nephrology
- Immunology
Background:
- Kidney transplant recipients often experience ocular complications, including dry eye.
- Immunosuppressive therapies, such as cyclosporine and azathioprine, are crucial for graft survival.
- The impact of these medications on tear production is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of oral cyclosporine on tear flow in renal allograft recipients.
- To compare tear flow in patients receiving cyclosporine versus azathioprine and control groups.
Main Methods:
- A Schirmer test was performed on control subjects, dialysis patients, and kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine or azathioprine.
- Tear flow was measured over 4 minutes using a standardized test with topical anesthetic.
- Data analysis included comparisons between and within groups.
Main Results:
- Kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine demonstrated significantly increased tear flow (19.0 mm/4 minutes) compared to controls (10.6 mm/4 minutes), dialysis patients (13.6 mm/4 minutes), and azathioprine recipients (10.4 mm/4 minutes).
- Tear flow in control subjects, dialysis patients, and azathioprine recipients was statistically similar.
- No significant differences in tear flow were observed based on sex or race within groups.
Conclusions:
- Oral cyclosporine significantly enhances tear flow in kidney transplant recipients, independent of autoimmune lacrimal disease.
- Azathioprine and medications used by dialysis patients did not significantly alter tear flow compared to controls.
- Cyclosporine's effect on tear production warrants further investigation in the context of post-transplant ocular health.