Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automating ward evaluations: a tentative first step

L G Moseley, D M Mead

    Journal of Clinical Nursing
    |November 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Research-based measurement tools in the audit process: issues of use, validity and reliability.

    Nurse researcher·2016
    Same author

    Applying lexical and semantic analysis to the exploration of free-text data.

    Nurse researcher·2016
    Same author

    An empirically-derived clinical placement evaluation tool: a 3-country study.

    Nurse education today·2004
    Same author

    Postoperative wound blistering: is there a link with dressing usage?

    Journal of wound care·2002
    Same author

    Smoking--do vascular surgeons practise what they preach?

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2000
    Same author

    Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Wales.

    The British journal of surgery·1999
    Same journal

    Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Pain and Patient Satisfaction During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    Same journal

    Nursing's Contribution to Patient Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury: An Integrative Review.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    Same journal

    EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Clinical Observation and Nursing Care on the Prevention of Abdominal Organ Cluster Transplantation Rejection.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    Same journal

    Parents' Experiences of Psychosocial Support in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    Same journal

    Response to the Letter to the Editor-Comment on 'The Effect of Theory-Guided Positive Psychological Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    Same journal

    Influence of a Multifaceted Nursing Practice Bundle to Support Hospitalised Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.

    Journal of clinical nursing·2026
    See all related articles

    Automating nursing practice audits with computer analysis of questionnaires provides quick feedback. This new method, tested across 654 wards, offers a more efficient and accurate approach to quality improvement in nursing.

    Area of Science:

    • Nursing Practice and Quality Improvement
    • Health Informatics
    • Healthcare Management

    Background:

    • Auditing nursing practice is essential for quality assurance but is often resource-intensive.
    • Current auditing methods are time-consuming and prone to errors.
    • Providing timely, individual feedback to nurses is challenging, especially in large healthcare settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and evaluate a novel, automated method for auditing nursing practice.
    • To assess the feasibility of generating automatic feedback reports for individual nurses.
    • To address the limitations of traditional auditing methods in large-scale studies.

    Main Methods:

    • A structured questionnaire was administered to collect data on nursing practice.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A computer program was utilized to analyze the questionnaire data.
  • Automated feedback reports were generated based on the analysis.
  • Main Results:

    • The automated method was applied to 654 nursing wards.
    • Initial informal evaluations from recipients of the feedback reports were positive.
    • The system demonstrated potential for efficient and accurate auditing.

    Conclusions:

    • The automated auditing method shows promise for improving efficiency and accuracy in nursing practice evaluation.
    • This approach facilitates the delivery of desirable individual feedback.
    • Further development is warranted to optimize this innovative auditing technique.