Related Experiment Videos
[Hip prosthesis infection: diagnostic approach and treatment of 27 cases]
M Salavert1, J Martínez, C Sánchez
1Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Mútua de Terrassa, Universidad de Barcelona.
Background:
Preoperative diagnosis of hip prosthesis infection (HPI) is difficult. There is no therapeutic option which is completely effective and without risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate a diagnostic approach and therapeutic strategy in a group of patients with HPI.
Patients And Methods:
A retrospective study of 27 episodes of HPI diagnosed by anatomopathologic and/or microbiologic examination of surgical samples was performed.
Results:
Twenty-three patients with 27 episodes of HPI out of a total of 24 hip prosthesis (HP) were treated. The infection was early in 15 episodes. The etiologic agents were plasmocoagulase negative staphylococcus (NSP) in 11 cases, P. aeruginosa in 8, S. aureus in 5, Enterococcus sp. in 2 and miscellaneous in the remaining cases. In 2 cases the infection was polymycrobial. Following a mean follow period of 22.6 +/- 15.2 months, 13 out of the 14 patients in whom the prosthesis was withdrawn were cured (in 4 a second prosthesis was implanted), one out of 6 in those in whom the prosthesis remained in situ following debridement, and 2 out of 3 episodes in whom reimplantation was performed over time. The withdrawal of the prosthesis was significantly greater than debridement in the treatment of early infection (p < 0.001). The total mean length of postoperative antibiotherapy was 48.2 +/- 17 days. No differences were observed in the oral versus parenteral treatment (p = 0.22), and nor was prognosis worse in those treated for less than 42 days.
Conclusions:
The authors' experience suggests that attempts to save a hip prosthesis in early infection usually fail. In addition to prosthesis withdrawal or implantation of another prosthesis, six weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, which may be oral route, appear to be sufficient.
Insights
For hip prosthesis infection (HPI), removing the infected prosthesis is more effective than debridement for early infections. Six weeks of postoperative antibiotics, oral or parenteral, appear sufficient for treatment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Diagnostics
Context:
- Hip prosthesis infection (HPI) presents diagnostic challenges and lacks universally effective, risk-free treatment options.
- Early diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial for successful patient outcomes.
Purpose:
- To evaluate a diagnostic approach and therapeutic strategy for hip prosthesis infection.
- To determine the efficacy of different treatment modalities for HPI.
Summary:
- A retrospective study analyzed 27 episodes of HPI in 23 patients, with common etiologies including Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Prosthesis withdrawal demonstrated significantly higher success rates than debridement in early HPI (p < 0.001).
- Postoperative antibiotic therapy averaging 48.2 days, with no significant difference between oral and parenteral routes, was administered.
Impact:
- Findings suggest that attempts to salvage hip prostheses in early infections often fail, supporting prosthesis removal or revision.
- Six weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, potentially administered orally, is proposed as a sufficient treatment duration.
- This study provides valuable insights for optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in managing hip prosthesis infections.