Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three assays for glycohemoglobin compared

U Turpeinen1, U Karjalainen, U H Stenman

  • 1Helsinki University Central Hospital, Laboratory, Finland.

Clinical Chemistry
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Comparing three glycohemoglobin (GHb) measurement methods revealed significant differences. The HPLC PolyCAT A method showed lower GHb values, impacting clinical follow-up when switching assays.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of external sleep disturbance on sleep architecture in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2023
Same author

Multiple sclerosis and vitamin D during pregnancy and lactation.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2014
Same author

Stability of first trimester placental growth factor in serum and whole blood.

Prenatal diagnosis·2011
Same author

Effects of fluoxetine treatment on striatal dopamine transporter binding and cerebrospinal fluid insulin-like growth factor-1 in children with autism.

Neuropediatrics·2011
Same author

Decreased oxygen saturation as a result of haemoglobin Titusville.

The clinical respiratory journal·2010
Same author

Prostate cancer incidence among finasteride and alpha-blocker users in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.

British journal of cancer·2009

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Glycohemoglobin (GHb) measurement is crucial for diabetes management.
  • Standardization of GHb assays is essential for accurate patient monitoring.
  • Different analytical methods may yield varying results, affecting clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the concordance of three distinct glycohemoglobin (GHb) determination methods.
  • To evaluate the suitability of the Diamat analyzer as a reference method for HbA1c calibration.
  • To assess the potential clinical implications of switching between GHb measurement techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three GHb measurement methods: Diamat (cation-exchange chromatography), IMx analyzer (boronate affinity binding), and HPLC with PolyCAT A column.
  • Analysis of 123 patient specimens.
  • Statistical analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Main Results:

  • Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.900 (PolyCAT A vs. Diamat) and 0.857 (PolyCAT A vs. IMx).
  • Up to twofold differences observed in some samples.
  • PolyCAT A method consistently yielded lower GHb proportions due to improved separation of HbA1c.
  • A 2-3% difference in glycation percentage noted between PolyCAT A and Diamat methods.

Conclusions:

  • The Diamat method has limitations as a reference method for calibrating other HbA1c assays.
  • Switching between GHb measurement methods can lead to significant clinical follow-up issues for patients.
  • Accurate and consistent GHb measurement is vital for effective diabetes patient care.

Related Experiment Videos