Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New ergonomic stand magnifiers

L A Spitzberg1, G L Goodrich

  • 1Optical Designs, Inc., Houston, TX 77079.

Journal of the American Optometric Association
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparison of patient reading performance and preference: optical devices, handheld CCTV (Innoventions Magni-Cam), or stand-mounted CCTV (Optelec Clearview or TSI Genie).

Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.)·2001
Same author

The design of a zoom stand magnifier--a new low vision device.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1994
Same author

Depth of field of plus lenses and reading telescopes.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1994
Same author

Testing the FOCOMETER--A new refractometer.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1993
Same author

Behind the lens telescope: a new concept in bioptics.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1989
Same author

Eccentric viewing training and low vision aids: current practice and implications of peripheral retinal research.

American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1986
Same journal

Visual skills profiles.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Dark adaptation and night blindness.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Scleral tonometry.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Staying in shape: the different roads to fitness for busy optometrists.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Hiring a new optometrist? Be prepared!

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Late traumatic intraocular lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
See all related articles

New ergonomic stand magnifiers offer improved reading experiences for low vision patients. Most participants preferred the novel designs over traditional magnifiers, indicating enhanced usability and effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional stand magnifiers present challenges for low vision patients' reading and near-vision tasks.
  • Existing magnifiers often lack ergonomic features crucial for sustained use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate four novel stand magnifiers with enhanced ergonomic features.
  • To compare the performance and user preference of these new magnifiers against a commercial model.

Main Methods:

  • Four new stand magnifiers were designed incorporating features like adjustable viewing angles, improved illumination, wider fields of view, variable magnification, and extended working distances.
  • Spherical mirror, cylindrical mirror, reflecting prism, and zoom magnifiers were developed.
  • Thirty-nine low vision patients tested the new magnifiers alongside a commercial stand magnifier, with reading speed and subject preference recorded.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Subject preference significantly shifted towards the new magnifiers over the testing period.
  • On the final day, 29 out of 39 subjects selected one of the new magnifiers as their preferred device.
  • Reading speeds were comparable across most devices, with the cylindrical magnifier showing slightly lower performance.

Conclusions:

  • The four ergonomically designed stand magnifiers were preferred by low vision patients over a standard commercial magnifier.
  • These novel designs demonstrate potential for improving visual aid effectiveness in low vision rehabilitation.