Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is peritoneal closure necessary?

D M Duffy1, G S diZerega

  • 1Livingston Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033.

Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-space observation of surface structuring induced by ultra-fast-laser illumination far below the melting threshold.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Improving the Functional Control of Aged Ferroelectrics Using Insights from Atomistic Modeling.

Physical review letters·2017
Same author

Deformation twinning and the role of amino acids and magnesium in calcite hardness from molecular simulation.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2015
Same author

Electronic effects in high-energy radiation damage in tungsten.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2015
Same author

The effect of surface topography on the micellisation of hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride at the silicon-aqueous interface.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2014
Same author

Electronic effects in high-energy radiation damage in iron.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2014
Same journal

Clinical Nuances of Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Literature Review.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
Same journal

A New Perspective on Endometriosis: How Gut and Reproductive Tract Microbiota Influence Disease Progression?

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
Same journal

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Gynecologic Cancers.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
Same journal

Amniotic Fluid Embolism: A Silent Threat to Maternal Life- An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review of the Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Outcome.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
Same journal

A System Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Intrauterine Adhesions.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
Same journal

Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
See all related articles

Peritoneal closure after laparotomy is debated. This review examines evidence for and against closing the peritoneum, considering factors like infection, herniation, and adhesion formation in abdominal surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Abdominal Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Peritoneal closure following laparotomy has been a surgical standard for over a century.
  • Historical perspectives emphasize preventing intestinal adhesions and reducing mortality.
  • Current practices are re-evaluated based on evolving surgical understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess the necessity of routine peritoneal closure in contemporary surgical practice.
  • To analyze the evidence supporting and refuting the benefits of peritoneal closure.
  • To provide a balanced summary of arguments in the context of modern abdominal surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature and surgical principles.
  • Analysis of arguments for peritoneal closure: anatomical restoration, infection prevention, herniation reduction, and adhesion minimization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of arguments against peritoneal closure: lack of observed detriment, rapid peritoneal healing, potential for suture-induced adhesions, and benefits of reduced surgical time.

    • Main Results:

    • Arguments for closure include tissue approximation, infection barrier, reduced herniation/dehiscence, and minimized adhesions.
    • Arguments against closure cite no observed harm, rapid healing, potential for suture-related adhesions, and benefits of shorter operative times.
    • The review synthesizes these contrasting viewpoints to evaluate current necessity.

    Conclusions:

    • The necessity of routine peritoneal closure after laparotomy requires re-examination.
    • Evidence suggests potential benefits of non-closure, including reduced adhesions and operative time.
    • Further research and clinical evaluation are needed to determine optimal practice regarding peritoneal closure.