Related Experiment Videos
Clinical assessment of parenting
D A Mrazek1, P Mrazek, M Klinnert
1Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010-2970.
Insights
The Parenting Risk Scale reliably and validly assesses five key parenting dimensions. This tool is crucial for understanding parenting quality in clinical settings, showing excellent concurrent and predictive validity.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Psychometrics
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Systematic assessment of parenting is crucial for understanding child development.
- Previous methods for assessing parenting have limitations.
- Identifying parenting dimensions is key for early intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the Parenting Risk Scale (PRS).
- To review previous systematic parenting assessment approaches.
- To detail a semistructured interview methodology for rating parenting concerns.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Parenting Risk Scale (PRS) using two cohorts of young children.
- One cohort (n=150) had increased genetic risk for asthma; the second cohort was at no elevated risk.
- Assessed parenting using a semistructured interview methodology.
Main Results:
- Parenting ratings demonstrated acceptable reliability with training.
- Excellent concurrent and predictive validity were established.
- High stability in parenting adequacy ratings was observed, with significant long-term associations (r = .42, p < .0001).
Conclusions:
- The Parenting Risk Scale is a reliable and valid measure.
- The scale systematically assesses five key dimensions of parenting.
- The PRS is appropriate for assessing parenting quality in clinical settings.
Objective:
This report describes the Parenting Risk Scale and reviews previous approaches to the systematic assessment of parenting. Five key dimensions of parenting are described as well as the method for rating the occurrence of difficulties and concerns about parenting using a semistructured interview methodology.
Method:
The Parenting Risk Scale was developed with two cohorts of young children. One cohort consisted of 150 children at increased genetic risk for developing asthma but who were physically healthy during the initial periods of assessment of parenting. A second cohort of healthy children at no elevated risk for asthma was similarly studied.
Results:
Reliability of the parenting ratings was found to be acceptable with appropriate training, and both concurrent and predictive validity were demonstrated to be excellent. High stability in the ratings of adequacy of parenting was documented. Specifically, ratings made during the prenatal assessment were highly significantly associated with completely independent ratings of parenting made more than 4 years after the birth of the index child (r = .42, p < .0001). The appropriateness of this method for the assessment of the quality of parenting in clinical settings is highlighted.
Conclusions:
The Parenting Risk Scale is a reliable and valid measure for the systemic assessment of five key dimensions of parenting.