A comparison of varieties of "second-order" motion

Bistable apparent-movement displays were created using four different kinds of "second-order" stimuli in which figures were defined by binocular disparity, spatial phase shifts of periodic luminance distributions, relative motion, and texture-element orientation differences. For each display, characteristics of the local structure of the figures, backgrounds, or both were varied. For each experimental condition, the type of apparent movement seen as a function of interstimulus interval was measured, and it was found that the relationship between perceived apparent movement and interstimulus interval differed across the types of displays viewed. The results suggest that the transformations between first-order stimulus properties and second-order motion may be too complex to imply a single uniform class of second-order motion detectors. Alternative physiological accounts of the results are discussed.