Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality improvement programs: alternative rewards

J L Henderson, W B Leisy, M M Lansky

    Seminars for Nurse Managers
    |September 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A qualitative study exploring youth's experiences of hospital- and integrated community-based mental health services: the YouthCan IMPACT initiative.

    BMC psychiatry·2025
    Same author

    Youth-developed recommendations on public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies: a national Delphi study.

    Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2025
    Same author

    Youth partner engagement in the development of an integrated care pathway for the treatment of adolescents with depression.

    Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent·2025
    Same author

    Are we out of the woods yet? Youth-developed recommendations on recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic: A national Delphi study.

    Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2025
    Same author

    Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study.

    BMC health services research·2024
    Same author

    Youth not engaged in education, employment, or training: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences in Canada.

    BMC public health·2024
    Same journal

    The case against mandatory overtime.

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    Same journal

    Succession planning: lessons from the legal field.

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    Same journal

    Measuring leadership: measuring what counts for succession planning.

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    Same journal

    Relationship management: a key strategy for effective succession planning.

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    Same journal

    Defining generations in succession planning: there are four!

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    Same journal

    Managing succession planning: the Inova Health System.

    Seminars for nurse managers·2003
    See all related articles

    Pay-for-quality programs in healthcare reward excellence and improve communication. Overcoming stakeholder skepticism through education highlights the benefits for institutions and nursing professionals.

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Management
    • Health Economics
    • Nursing Administration

    Background:

    • The healthcare industry is increasingly shifting towards value-based care models.
    • Pay-for-quality initiatives aim to align financial incentives with high-quality patient outcomes.
    • Stakeholder buy-in is crucial for the successful implementation of these programs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the benefits of pay-for-quality programs in healthcare.
    • To examine alternative compensation strategies for healthcare professionals.
    • To illustrate the practical application and outcomes of quality-based pay.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of intrinsic issues and opportunities in alternative compensation models.
    • Case study analysis of a hospital's implementation of a pay-for-quality program.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of benefits for healthcare institutions and nursing staff.

    • Main Results:

    • Pay-for-quality programs reinforce organizational values and improve communication.
    • Successful implementation requires careful stakeholder education and communication to address skepticism.
    • Quality-based pay demonstrates typical benefits for healthcare organizations and their nursing professionals.

    Conclusions:

    • Pay-for-quality initiatives offer significant advantages for healthcare organizations and nursing professionals.
    • Addressing stakeholder concerns through education is key to program adoption.
    • The shift towards quality-based compensation is a strategic move for healthcare excellence.