Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Setting mental health priorities: problems and possibilities

D Callahan1

  • 1Hastings Center, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.

The Milbank Quarterly
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Mental health services should have full parity with other health services. Priority should be given to those with the most pronounced suffering and functional impairment, even if treatments are less effective.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fusion Energy Output Greater than the Kinetic Energy of an Imploding Shell at the National Ignition Facility.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Indications of flow near maximum compression in layered deuterium-tritium implosions at the National Ignition Facility.

Physical review. E·2016
Same author

Generation and Beaming of Early Hot Electrons onto the Capsule in Laser-Driven Ignition Hohlraums.

Physical review letters·2016
Same author

First high-convergence cryogenic implosion in a near-vacuum hohlraum.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Charged-particle spectroscopy for diagnosing shock ρR and strength in NIF implosions.

The Review of scientific instruments·2012
Same author

Measurement of electron temperature of imploded capsules at the National Ignition Facility.

The Review of scientific instruments·2012

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Health Services Research
  • Mental Health Policy

Background:

  • The Hastings Center project addressed priority setting in mental health services.
  • A key question was whether mental health services require independent prioritization.
  • The study advocates for full parity between mental health and other health services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the appropriate prioritization of mental health services within the broader healthcare landscape.
  • To explore the integration of empirical evidence with ethical and political considerations in healthcare priority setting.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical frameworks for healthcare resource allocation.
  • Examination of empirical data on treatment outcomes and efficacy in mental health.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public HealthMedicaidMental Health Therapies

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of political and ethical interests influencing evidence interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Mental health services should not be prioritized independently but should have full parity with physical health services.
    • Priority in resource allocation should be given to individuals with the most severe functional impairment and suffering.
    • This prioritization holds even when treatments for these conditions are less efficacious compared to others.

    Conclusions:

    • Full parity for mental health services is ethically and practically essential.
    • A nuanced approach to priority setting is required, balancing empirical evidence with the severity of patient suffering and functional impact.
    • Ethical considerations must guide the interpretation and application of scientific evidence in mental health resource allocation.