Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study

D V Beard1, B M Hemminger, E D Pisano

  • 1Department of Radiology, Computer Science, and Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7510.

Journal of Digital Imaging
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An update on mammography.

Surgical technology international·2015
Same author

Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2011
Same author

Characterization of diffraction-enhanced imaging contrast in breast cancer.

Physics in medicine and biology·2009
Same author

Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique.

Medical physics·2005
Same author

Breast disease. Introduction.

Breast disease·2005
Same author

Digital mammography.

Breast disease·2005
Same journal

Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Imaging Classification: A Promising Solution for Deep Learning Limits in Data Scarcity Scenarios.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Detecting and Characterizing Inferior Vena Cava Filters on Abdominal Computed Tomography with Data-Driven Computational Frameworks.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

DMCA-GAN: Dual Multilevel Constrained Attention GAN for MRI-Based Hippocampus Segmentation.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Left Ventricular Myocardial Dysfunction Evaluation in Thalassemia Patients Using Echocardiographic Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

External Validation of Robust Radiomic Signature to Predict 2-Year Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
See all related articles

Low-cost computed tomography (CT) workstations offer practical application for interpreting digital medical images. While interpretation times were similar to film, some users experienced working-memory strain, suggesting a need for additional training.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Technology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Traditional film-based interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) images is a standard diagnostic procedure.
  • Digital medical imaging offers potential advantages in image display and manipulation.
  • Evaluating the clinical utility and efficiency of early digital workstations is crucial for adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the interpretation time and accuracy of a low-cost digital workstation versus traditional film for chest and abdomen CT scans.
  • To assess the clinical acceptability and potential usability issues of early digital CT interpretation workstations.
  • To evaluate the impact of digital workstation technology on radiologist workflow and cognitive load.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A prototype digital workstation with dual high-resolution monitors was compared against film interpretation.
  • A repeated-measures experiment was conducted with four subjects interpreting chest and abdomen CT images.
  • Interpretation times, report accuracy, and qualitative feedback from radiologists were collected and analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Average interpretation times were comparable: 6.17 minutes for the workstation and 6.03 minutes for film.
    • All dictated reports demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy.
    • Three of four subjects experienced longer interpretation times with the workstation, suggesting potential learning curve or cognitive load effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Low-cost digital workstations are a viable clinical tool for interpreting CT images.
    • While accuracy is maintained, interpretation time may slightly increase, particularly for less frequent users.
    • Human working-memory strain was observed, indicating a potential need for user training and ergonomic considerations in workstation design.