Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

For what should hospitals be accountable?

H R Rubin1

  • 1Program for Medical Technology and Practice Assessment, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center.

Quality & safety in health care·2003
Same author

The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2002
Same author

From a process of care to a measure: the development and testing of a quality indicator.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2002
Same author

Reasons for pediatrician nonadherence to asthma guidelines.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·2001
Same author

Applying clinical guidelines to pediatric practice.

Pediatric annals·2001
Same author

Benchmarking applications: linking state strategic planning, quality improvement, and consumer reporting.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2001

Hospitals need better public accountability to prove high-quality, efficient care. A federal effort is recommended to create standard quality measures and ensure data reliability for all patients.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health Policy
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Public trust in hospitals hinges on demonstrating accountability for high-quality and efficient patient care.
  • Hospitals must prove they serve patients' best interests, especially for public payers.
  • Accountability frameworks are essential for maintaining public confidence in healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight deficiencies in current hospital public accountability mechanisms.
  • To identify the need for systematic approaches to ensure high-quality hospital care.
  • To address the duplicative, incomplete, and unreliable nature of existing quality monitoring efforts.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current public accountability mechanisms for hospitals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of existing efforts to monitor hospital care quality.
  • Review of data reliability and validity assessment in public reporting.

    • Main Results:

    • Current public accountability mechanisms are neither comprehensive nor systematic.
    • Existing quality monitoring efforts are duplicative, incomplete, and often lack reliability and validity.
    • There is no routine evaluation of the reliability and validity of publicly released hospital quality data.

    Conclusions:

    • Recommendations for standardized information disclosure by hospitals to federal agencies.
    • Advocacy for a federal initiative to develop standard quality measures for hospital care.
    • Proposal for designated agencies to monitor hospital quality and ensure data reliability and validity.