Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II

A H Cook1, T A Sellke, E A BeGole

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some sulphanilamidophenyl cyanides and related compounds.

Journal of the Chemical Society·2010
Same author

An antibacterial pigment from Fusarium javanicum.

Nature·2010
Same author

Experiments in the piperidine series.

Journal of the Chemical Society·2010
Same author

The reactivity of gamma-pyrone quaternary salts.

Journal of the Chemical Society·2010
Same author

Production of antibiotics by fungi.

British journal of experimental pathology·2010
Same author

Two Cases of Blood Poisoning in which Antistreptococcic Serum was Used.

British medical journal·2010

This study assessed cephalometric superimposition techniques for dental changes. Ricketts' positions 3 and 4 are recommended for their ease and reliability in analyzing maxillary and mandibular changes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and Dental Imaging
  • Cephalometric Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate cephalometric superimposition is crucial for evaluating dental and skeletal changes over time.
  • Various techniques exist for superimposing serial cephalometric radiographs, each with potential limitations in reliability and validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of different maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques.
  • To compare the descriptive analyses of dental changes produced by these methods.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cephalometric study design was employed.
  • Maxillary superimposition techniques evaluated: Ricketts' position three and 'best fit'.
  • Mandibular superimposition techniques evaluated: Ricketts' position four and Björk structural method.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All evaluated superimposition techniques demonstrated statistical reproducibility and reliability.
  • Mandibular techniques (Ricketts' position four, Björk) yielded comparable analyses of mandibular dental changes.
  • Maxillary techniques (Ricketts' position three, 'best fit') produced different descriptions of maxillary dental changes, possibly due to the subjectivity of the 'best fit' method.

Conclusions:

  • While all methods were reliable, validity could not be definitively established without a control like implants.
  • Ricketts' positions three and four are recommended for maxillary and mandibular superimposition, respectively, due to their simplicity and proven reliability.