Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues: changing attitudes and practices

M M Henderson1

  • 1Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104.

Cancer Detection and Prevention
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nutritional aspects of breast cancer.

Cancer·1995
Same author

Priorities for research to meet women's health needs.

Annals of epidemiology·1994
Same author

Maintenance of a low-fat diet: follow-up of the Women's Health Trial.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·1992
Same author

Role of intervention trials in research on nutrition and cancer.

Cancer research·1992
Same author

International differences in diet and cancer incidence.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·1992
Same author

Cancer incidence in Seattle Women's Health Trial Participants by group and time since randomization.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1991
Same journal

Melanoma metastasis to the breast: a diagnostic pitfall.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
Same journal

Development of a rat model by 3,4-benzopyrene intra-pulmonary injection and evaluation of the effect of green tea drinking on p53 and bcl-2 expression in lung carcinoma.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
Same journal

Combined effect of NAT2, MTR and MTHFR genotypes and tobacco on bladder cancer susceptibility in Tunisian population.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
Same journal

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism(s) and breast cancer risk in north Indians.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
Same journal

Epidemiology of primary brain tumors in the Middle Eastern population in California, USA 2001-2005.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
Same journal

Lifetime consumption of alcoholic beverages and risk of 13 types of cancer in men: results from a case-control study in Montreal.

Cancer detection and prevention·2009
See all related articles

Ethical considerations in cancer prevention research are crucial at all levels. Addressing inclusion, liability, and safety ensures responsible advancements in public health interventions and aligns funding with national needs.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Bioethics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Cancer prevention research faces complex ethical challenges.
  • Demands for inclusivity from women and minorities, and clinician participation, highlight these issues.
  • Lack of consensus exists regarding participant-investigator contracts and liability for interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine critical ethical questions in cancer prevention research.
  • To illustrate these ethical dilemmas using ongoing U.S. chemoprevention and behavioral trials.
  • To question how research funding priorities align with national needs and public preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical considerations in cancer prevention research.
  • Case illustrations from U.S. chemoprevention and behavioral intervention trials.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of research funding priorities and their impact on public health.
  • Main Results:

    • Identified key ethical issues including participant inclusion, informed consent, liability, and safety standards.
    • Highlighted the need for clear ethical frameworks in cancer prevention research.
    • Raised concerns about the alignment of research funding with societal needs.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical questions in cancer prevention research require multi-level attention.
    • Clearer guidelines are needed for participant safety and liability in public health interventions.
    • Future research funding decisions must consider national health priorities and public preferences.