Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning

T L Spalding1, B H Ross

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abstract coherent categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Concept learning and feature interpretation.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

The effects of category use on learned categories.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Induction with cross-classified categories.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

People learn categories by comparing examples. Comparing similar items highlights shared features, making them seem more important for category learning and influencing future learning. This impacts how we represent categories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Category learning is fundamental to cognition.
  • Existing models often focus on statistical regularities, but human learning involves comparison.
  • The role of comparative processes in feature weighting is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how comparing instances influences category learning.
  • To determine if comparison-based learning affects feature importance and subjective frequency.
  • To explore the impact of early comparison experiences on subsequent learning.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted to examine comparison-based category learning.
  • Participants learned categories by comparing new instances with existing ones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjective feature frequency and sensitivity to feature correlations were measured.

    • Main Results:

    • Features common to compared instances were rated as more important for the category.
    • What is learned is dependent on which instances are selected for comparison.
    • Comparison processes influence subjective feature frequency and sensitivity to feature correlations.
    • Early learning comparisons affect what is learned from later instances.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparative processes play a crucial role in category representation.
    • Models of category learning should account for the impact of instance comparisons.
    • Feature importance is dynamically shaped by comparative learning experiences.