Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Verification of reference ranges by using a Monte Carlo sampling technique

E W Holmes1, S E Kahn, P A Molnar

  • 1Department of Pathology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153.

Clinical Chemistry
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring residual risk for diabetes and microvascular disease in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS).

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2017
Same author

Steroid Sex Hormones, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and Diabetes Incidence in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2015
Same author

The duodenal glucose load impacts the oral disposition index in healthy subjects.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2015
Same author

Visceral abdominal fat accumulation predicts the conversion of metabolically healthy obese subjects to an unhealthy phenotype.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2015
Same author

Glucocorticoid receptor gene expression in adipose tissue and associated metabolic risk in black and white South African women.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2014
Same author

Diabetes autoantibodies do not predict progression to diabetes in adults: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2014

Monte Carlo significance tests offer a robust method for verifying laboratory reference ranges during inter-laboratory transfers. These statistical tests effectively compare sample data, ensuring accuracy when transferring established ranges between facilities.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical laboratory science
  • Biostatistics
  • Analytical chemistry

Background:

  • Establishing and transferring accurate laboratory reference ranges is critical for consistent clinical diagnostics.
  • Traditional methods for reference range verification can be limited, especially when dealing with inter-laboratory data transfer.
  • Statistical validation is essential to ensure the reliability of diagnostic testing across different laboratory settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of Monte Carlo significance tests for verifying laboratory reference ranges.
  • To provide a procedural outline for implementing these tests in a practical laboratory setting.
  • To evaluate the performance characteristics of Monte Carlo tests with varying sample sizes and variances.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Introduction to the principles of Monte Carlo simulation and significance testing.
  • Detailed procedure for conducting Monte Carlo significance tests using commercial software.
  • Comparative analysis of test performance across different sample data sets (varying sizes and variances).

Main Results:

  • Demonstration of Monte Carlo significance tests' applicability in reference range verification.
  • Identification of key operating characteristics influencing test sensitivity and specificity.
  • Validation of the method's effectiveness in comparing laboratory data with different statistical properties.

Conclusions:

  • Monte Carlo significance tests provide a powerful and adaptable tool for the verification of laboratory reference ranges.
  • The presented methodology facilitates the reliable transfer of established reference ranges between laboratories.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy and comparability of diagnostic results across different testing environments.