Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Number processing in deaf college students

K I Epstein1, E G Hillegeist, J Grafman

  • 1School of Preparatory Studies, Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C.

American Annals of the Deaf
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the brain basis of self-monitoring.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Clinical and MRI Predictors of Conversion From Mild Behavioural Impairment to Dementia.

The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry·2020
Same author

Aligning nomenclature for cognitive changes associated with anaesthesia and surgery with broader diagnostic classifications of non-surgical populations: a needed first step.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

'Emotional Intelligence': Lessons from Lesions.

Trends in neurosciences·2016
Same author

Effects of High-Definition and Conventional tDCS on Response Inhibition.

Brain stimulation·2016
Same author

Acquired alexithymia following damage to the anterior insula.

Neuropsychologia·2016
Same journal

Breaking the Cycle: How Core Self-Evaluation Shapes Cyber-Relationship Addiction.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Eye Tracking Shows Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children with Cochlear Implants Read Like Hearing Peers.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Interpreting in Higher Education: American Sign Language-English Interpreters' Experience of the Structural and Cultural Environment within a University.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Itinerant Teachers' Writing Instruction.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Integrating Worlds: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study on the Influence of Deaf Role Models as Expressed by Hearing Parents.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Language and Pretend Actions Understanding in Children with Hearing Loss.

American annals of the deaf·2026
See all related articles

Deaf college students showed similar accuracy to hearing students in number tasks, but took longer to respond. Researchers explored potential factors influencing these cognitive processing differences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding number processing in diverse populations is crucial for educational and cognitive research.
  • Previous research on cognitive abilities in deaf individuals has yielded varied results.
  • Investigating potential differences in cognitive tasks can inform theories of learning and development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate number processing abilities in deaf college students compared to their hearing peers.
  • To identify any discrepancies in accuracy and response time during cognitive tasks.
  • To explore factors potentially influencing observed differences in number processing.

Main Methods:

  • Administered tasks assessing magnitude comparison, calculation verification, and short-term memory span.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recruited deaf and hearing college students for participation.
  • Measured accuracy and response times for all experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Deaf students demonstrated comparable accuracy levels to hearing students across all tasks.
    • Deaf students exhibited significantly longer mean response times compared to hearing students.
    • No significant differences in accuracy were found, suggesting intact basic number representation.

    Conclusions:

    • While accuracy was similar, slower response times in deaf students warrant further investigation.
    • The role of developmental factors, working memory capacity, and sign language communication requires further study.
    • Findings suggest that while core number processing may be unaffected, cognitive processing speed might differ in deaf individuals.