Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The problems with rule-based rationing

M A Hall1

  • 1Wake Forest University School of Law, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of thermal stimulation during the late phase of incubation on hatching results and post-hatch broiler performance under commercial conditions.

British poultry science·2016
Same author

IN VITRO CHEMOTHERAPY PROFILING OF WELL-DIFFERENTIATED MIDGUT NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS (NETS) BASED ON INDIVIDUAL PATIENT TUMOR BIOMARKERS ANALYSIS.

The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society·2016
Same author

Studies on the movement and distribution of ethylene in Vicia faba L.

Planta·2014
Same author

The compartmentation of ethylene in developing cotyledons of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Planta·2014
Same author

Studies on ethylene binding by cell-free preparations from cotyledons of Phaseolus vulgaris L. : I. Separation and characterisation.

Planta·2013
Same author

Studies on ethylene binding by cell free preparations from cotyledons of Phaseolus vulgaris L. : II. Effects of structural analogues of ethylene and of inhibitors.

Planta·2013
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

"It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Centralized rules for healthcare rationing are often favored, but this article argues against them. Rule-based rationing is imprecise and subject to bias, making physician discretion essential for fair medical resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Medical Ethics
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Centralized, democratic rules are frequently proposed as a superior method for healthcare rationing compared to individual physician judgment.
  • This perspective often overlooks the inherent limitations and potential drawbacks of rule-based systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the deficiencies of rule-based rationing in healthcare.
  • To advocate for the continued importance of physician discretion in resource allocation decisions.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs a critical analysis of existing literature and ethical frameworks concerning healthcare rationing.
  • It explores the practical and theoretical shortcomings of implementing rigid, rule-based systems.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Rule-based rationing demonstrates significant imprecision in capturing patient-specific medical nuances and individual value judgments regarding risk and benefit.
  • Political processes introduce biases through interest group pressures, potentially compromising equitable resource distribution.
  • Rule-based systems can diminish physician accountability for rationing decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Rule-based rationing is insufficient due to its imprecision and susceptibility to bias.
  • Internalizing cost constraints offers a more viable and ethically sound approach to rationing.
  • Physician discretion, or bedside rationing, remains indispensable for nuanced and responsible healthcare resource allocation, even within a predominantly rule-based framework.