Stent-induced intimal hyperplasia: are there fundamental differences between flexible and rigid stent designs?

To evaluate possible differences in neointimal development resulting from overdilation of rigid versus flexible vascular stents.

Twelve vascular sheaths were placed bilaterally through femoral arteries in six swine. After angiographic measurement, 12 stents (six flexible and six rigid) were balloon expanded to 8-mm diameters in 12 6-mm iliac arteries (approximately 30% overdilation). All stents were similar in surface area, gauge, and type of wire (tantalum). The primary difference was longitudinal flexibility (low hoop strength) versus rigidity (high hoop strength). Stents were studied with angiography and intravascular ultrasound 5 weeks after implantation. The animals were killed, and the stented segments were removed and examined histologically.

Rigid stents maintained larger diameters than flexible stents: mean, 6.52 mm versus 5.82 mm (mean difference, 0.70; standard deviation [SD], 0.47; confidence interval [CI], +/- 0.49; P < .05). In addition, rigid stents developed a thicker, eccentric neointimal reaction relative to flexible stents: mean 1.08 mm versus 0.74 mm (mean difference, 0.338; SD, 0.315; CI, +/- 0.331; P < .05).

Rigid stents maintain larger diameters over the long term relative to flexible stents when overdilated in normal swine arteries. However, a thicker neointima develops within the lumen of rigid stents at follow-up (greater late loss).