Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Faculty and administration views of problems in faculty evaluation

R F Jones1, J D Froom

  • 1Section for Institutional and Faculty Policy Studies, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C. 20037.

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Medical school faculty evaluation faces significant challenges, particularly in assessing teaching effectiveness and integrating feedback into academic rewards. Improving these systems remains a key goal for medical education.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nutrient stress alters the glycosylation status of LGR5 resulting in reduced protein stability and membrane localisation in colorectal tumour cells: implications for targeting cancer stem cells.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Murine animal model.

Methods in molecular medicine·2011
Same author

Immunotherapy and gene therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Urologic oncology·2011
Same author

Surgical Treatment of the Hypertrophied Prostate: Perineal and Suprapubic Prostatectomy.

Journal of the National Medical Association·2010
Same author

The Control of Gonorrhea.

Journal of the National Medical Association·2010
Same author

One Stage Suprapubic Prostatectomy : Fifty-One Consecutive Cases of 1939 and 1940.

Journal of the National Medical Association·2010

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Academic Administration
  • Faculty Development

Background:

  • Faculty evaluation is crucial for academic advancement and institutional quality.
  • Current systems may not adequately capture the multifaceted contributions of medical school faculty.
  • Understanding diverse perspectives on evaluation is essential for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify problems in medical school faculty evaluation from faculty and administrator viewpoints.
  • To explore how role variations influence perceptions of evaluation challenges.
  • To inform strategies for enhancing faculty assessment processes.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional survey distributed to deans at accredited U.S. and Canadian medical schools.
  • Questionnaires were completed by deans and a stratified sample of faculty (chairs, promotion committee members, senior/junior faculty).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Content analysis of open-ended responses detailing perceived evaluation problems.

    • Main Results:

    • A 46% response rate was achieved from 102 U.S. and 8 Canadian medical schools.
    • The most prominent issue identified was the inadequacy of teaching evaluation methods and recognition.
    • Concerns also included research assessment, clinical care evaluation, departmental inconsistencies, lack of regular reviews, and salary linkage.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite potential response bias, the study highlights strong faculty and administrator concerns regarding evaluation.
    • Improving the assessment of faculty teaching is a critical and ongoing challenge in medical education.
    • Addressing systemic issues in evaluation is vital for faculty development and institutional effectiveness.