Related Experiment Videos
[Results of systematic programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction. Which protocol should be
B Brembilla-Perrot1, A T de La Chaise, D Beurrier
1Services de cardiologie A et B, CHU de Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy.
Abstract:
The authors report the prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias induced by routine programmed ventricular stimulation after the acute phase of myocardial infarction. The protocol consisted of two extrastimuli in the first 185 patients and 3 extrastimuli in 308 patients. The use of 3 extrastimuli increased the incidence of inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) < 270/mn, from 17 to 22% and, more importantly, that of ventricular fibrillation from 4 to 17%. Induction of ventricular flutter (monomorphic VT > 270/mn) was not increased. A long follow-up period (average 4 +/- 2 years) showed that the risk of VT was increased during the first months after infarction (n = 14), and that, 4 years later, other patients develop VT (n = 6). The risk of serious arrhythmias (VT and sudden death) was significantly higher in patients with inducible VT < 270/mn (20%) than in patients without inducible VT, but it was also higher in patients with inducible ventricular flutter (12.5%). The use of a third extrastimulus has a low positive predictive value for arrhythmic events (10%). This study confirms that the induction of sustained monomorphic VT after myocardial infarction is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic events but the positive predictive value is relatively low (17%). In view of the risk of inducing non-specific ventricular fibrillation, the authors recommended using a stimulation protocol with only 2 ventricular extrastimuli.