Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using cell replication data in mathematical modeling in carcinogenesis

C J Portier1, A Kopp-Schneider, C D Sherman

  • 1Risk Methodology Section, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybrid imaging with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2022
Same author

An R-shiny application to calculate optimal designs for single substance and interaction trials in dose response experiments.

Toxicology letters·2020
Same author

Assessment of glucose metabolism and cellular proliferation in multiple myeloma: a first report on combined <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>18</sup>F-FLT PET/CT imaging.

EJNMMI research·2018
Same author

<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2018
Same author

Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography.

Clinical radiology·2017
Same author

Use of LDH and autoimmune side effects to predict response to ipilimumab treatment.

Immunotherapy·2016
Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
See all related articles

Quantitative models estimate cancer risks using dose-response data. This study examines existing models and the development of new ones to align with scientific advancements in carcinogenesis research.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Carcinogenesis
  • Quantitative Risk Assessment
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Risk estimation relies on dose-response models for carcinogenicity data.
  • Advances in science necessitate sophisticated, mechanism-based models for risk assessment.
  • Current approaches face challenges in keeping pace with rapid research developments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between existing quantitative models and novel approaches in carcinogen risk estimation.
  • To highlight the integration of advanced biological, computational, and mathematical methods in risk assessment.
  • To address the evolving landscape of carcinogen risk modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing quantitative dose-response models for carcinogenicity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of mechanistically based carcinogenesis models.
  • Discussion of strategies for developing new models aligned with research progress.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of key distinctions between data-driven and mechanistic models.
    • Emphasis on the growing complexity and sophistication of risk assessment tools.
    • Recognition of the need for adaptive model development in carcinogen risk assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • The field of carcinogen risk estimation is advancing through complex, mechanistically based models.
    • Distinguishing between established and emerging modeling techniques is crucial.
    • Continuous development of new models is essential to reflect scientific progress in understanding carcinogenesis.